hp-38 powder Fundamentals Explained

Posted September eleven, 2009 Did a look for but did not find Significantly details on HP38. It appears that evidently some stated that It truly is "related" to W231 but would not appear that HP38 is a well-liked powder...

With in the vicinity of max hundreds I generally again it off when switching to a different wide range of powder. A long time ago there was chat online of big variation in RE19. My .338 Winchester at enough time chrono graphed hundreds at under max charge higher in velocity than just what the e book had for max loads.

Any this kind of assumption is solely that of the person reader, along with the charts were being never ever intended to Express any kind of assert the listed powders had been a similar.

Any modify they make to the powder will modify It is really burn off characteristics. One example is, BE86 is identical in each individual strategy to Power Pistol, apart from obtaining an additional flash suppressant, which results in it to burn up a little bit more quickly. I am unable to picture they're continue to producing 231/HP38 the same exact way they did in 1978.

So I stopped in at the LGS and the only real handgun powders they had was W231 and HP-38. What a coincident or more likely from your exact batch. I went While using the W231

For by far the most comprehensive current load knowledge, such as the most recent new calibre introductions, be sure to go to the Reloading Facts Centre on Hodgdons website.

Medium burn amount powders consider a few inches of bullet journey to absolutely burn up, which will increase velocity substantially. Mid-melt away charge powders are exceptional for semi-autos since they need to have an extended tension pulse to operate the slide whilst producing higher velocity HP38 powde at a decrease chamber tension.

Slow burning powders will take as much as fifteen" of bullet journey to thoroughly melt away up. These powders are used in magnum revolver masses since they go on to press a bullet more quickly and faster until eventually it finally leaves the muzzle.

Nothing at all there implies They can be exactly the same powders, or are even of the same manufacture, or have like demand weights in almost any specific software.

Acquiring one that is as multipurpose coupled with remaining inexpensive and fewer smoky with Solid is providing me grief. I discover one that appears fantastic for 40 and realize that it isn't a good choice for nine... I believe I'd consider Electric power Pistol following.

Bullseye is a tricky act to stick to, but I do think it's truthful to say that Hodgdon HP-38 has accomplished an exceedingly admirable work of it which is nipping at the heels of Bullseye.

Having said that, you'll find scenarios with direct bullet masses in revolvers where you actually require bigger force to force bullets to obturate (bump up in diameter from chamber pressure). With quite a few powder producers building powder ... there are usually a number of powders which have the ideal burn fee in your application.

What the relatively poorly labeled ADI chart you cited truly is, is "around the same burn up amount" data. It's not at all a "these powders are a similar" chart. For HP38 powde instance, 700X and WST are claimed to be "equivalent powders" on that chart from ADI.

This is an more mature thread, you may not receive a reaction, and could be reviving an outdated thread. Make sure you consider making a new thread.